Wednesday, October 27, 2010

Election Fraud?

Someone please explain to me how ALL of the 'errors', 'mistakes', 'glitches', and 'calibration issues' with early voting resulted in default ballots that favored a Democratic Party candidate? Once is a fluke. Twice is coincidence. Three or more times? That is enemy action. It is almost as if the Secretaries of State, and the Voting Commissions in these areas are all plants of George Soros and Harry Reid.

What's that? They are? Oh...

The adage is proving true:
"You know, comrades," says Stalin, "that I think in regard to this: I consider it completely unimportant who in the party will vote, or how; but what is extraordinarily important is this — who will count the votes, and how."
I posted a little while ago (HERE) about what I felt the mood of the people was. I postulated that WHEN the vote fraud (not if) and election stealing comes to light, that the people are going to be more than a little pissed. The incident in Kentucky last night is just the tip of the iceberg. Throw a vengeful 'Lame Duck' session into the mix where the Dims are going to ram through everything else that they want done, and this powder keg is going to go up.

Keep your head down and make sure you are prepared. This is going to get bumpy

Newbius
|||

1 comment:

Bubblehead Les. said...

Pray you're wrong, but one still has to keep your powder dry just in case. I would also add that during the Lame Duck, don't be surprised if some soon-to-be out of work RINO's vote with the DemiCommies out of spite.