Our esteemed military then showed true class and prepared the body for a dignified burial at sea.
I only hope that they chummed the water first.
Newbius
|||
Showing posts with label Jihad. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Jihad. Show all posts
Monday, May 2, 2011
Monday, March 9, 2009
Martyrs Wanted...
Martyrs wanted*:
International organization desires young men with no family attachments who are willing to die for the advancement of the cause. Must be willing and able to kill innocent people, especially women and children, in a public environment.
Position assumes a very high likelihood of personal incarceration, injury, or death.
Applicants may submit qualifications by mail or in person at:
XXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXX
If this advertisement were to appear in a local paper or online message board, then people would assume that the organization in question was a Jihadist organization. The people reading this advertisement would be horrified, yet Jihadist organizations recruit people every day to do exactly what this ad suggests. The Jihadists are at least HONEST in their approach to murder and mayhem. They are HONEST in their goals, and state them openly-"Death to all infidels: Convert or die".
If your reaction to the above ad was revulsion, then good. You are still human.
Now, think about organizations which use the public killing of innocent men, women and children to advance their goals.
No, not Jihadists.
Gun control advocates.
If I told you that the above advertisement was instead placed by The Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence, or the Violence Policy Center, or The Children's Defense Fund, or the Coalition to Stop Gun Violence, or the Joyce Foundation, would your reaction be any different?
Would the killing of innocent lives be pounced upon by any of these groups in order to buttress their arguments against the private ownership of firearms?
You bet it would.
The groups who capitalize on the murdering of innocents using firearms must be salivating at the prospect of the next group of deaths, in order that they may advance their cause a little bit more. In my opinion, these groups are worse than radical Jihadists. They are worse because they pounce upon any tragedy to advance their agenda, yet don't have the courage of their convictions to openly state their goal of total civilian disarmament.
Think about that the next time you denounce a Jihadist, yet fall into lock-step with someone advocating the abrogation of one of YOUR civil rights.
|||
Pax,
Newbius
*This advertisement is completely fictional and is placed here to prove a point. I have no evidence to support that any advocacy group is actively seeking people to kill innocent school children. I do have evidence that they use these killings, when they do occur, to advance their policy agendas. Deal with it.
International organization desires young men with no family attachments who are willing to die for the advancement of the cause. Must be willing and able to kill innocent people, especially women and children, in a public environment.
Position assumes a very high likelihood of personal incarceration, injury, or death.
Applicants may submit qualifications by mail or in person at:
XXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXX
If this advertisement were to appear in a local paper or online message board, then people would assume that the organization in question was a Jihadist organization. The people reading this advertisement would be horrified, yet Jihadist organizations recruit people every day to do exactly what this ad suggests. The Jihadists are at least HONEST in their approach to murder and mayhem. They are HONEST in their goals, and state them openly-"Death to all infidels: Convert or die".
If your reaction to the above ad was revulsion, then good. You are still human.
Now, think about organizations which use the public killing of innocent men, women and children to advance their goals.
No, not Jihadists.
Gun control advocates.
If I told you that the above advertisement was instead placed by The Brady Campaign to Prevent Gun Violence, or the Violence Policy Center, or The Children's Defense Fund, or the Coalition to Stop Gun Violence, or the Joyce Foundation, would your reaction be any different?
Would the killing of innocent lives be pounced upon by any of these groups in order to buttress their arguments against the private ownership of firearms?
You bet it would.
The groups who capitalize on the murdering of innocents using firearms must be salivating at the prospect of the next group of deaths, in order that they may advance their cause a little bit more. In my opinion, these groups are worse than radical Jihadists. They are worse because they pounce upon any tragedy to advance their agenda, yet don't have the courage of their convictions to openly state their goal of total civilian disarmament.
Think about that the next time you denounce a Jihadist, yet fall into lock-step with someone advocating the abrogation of one of YOUR civil rights.
|||
Pax,
Newbius
*This advertisement is completely fictional and is placed here to prove a point. I have no evidence to support that any advocacy group is actively seeking people to kill innocent school children. I do have evidence that they use these killings, when they do occur, to advance their policy agendas. Deal with it.
Thursday, March 5, 2009
A tale of two countries...
Hat tip to Atlas Shrugs for this item.
I have a couple of comments:
1. Good for the Isreali police for stopping the attack.
2. Good for the armed Isreali citizens who assisted.
3. Based upon the response of Hamas, it is obvious that the "religion of peace" is anything but.
[EDIT: Sarcasm Alert!]
If this had happened in the United States, then the assisting citizen would have been shot by the police (and the report falsified to cover up the cop's actions), who would have been lauded as heroes. Then, some Liberal Democrat would propose a bill before the State or National Legislature attempting to ban tractors and bulldozers as assault weapons. Lastly, the Obama administration would issue a letter of apology to Hamas for the misunderstanding and offer another $900 Billion for the Palestinians.
[EDIT: /Sarcasm]
Did I miss anything?
|||
Pax,
Newbius
I have a couple of comments:
1. Good for the Isreali police for stopping the attack.
2. Good for the armed Isreali citizens who assisted.
3. Based upon the response of Hamas, it is obvious that the "religion of peace" is anything but.
[EDIT: Sarcasm Alert!]
If this had happened in the United States, then the assisting citizen would have been shot by the police (and the report falsified to cover up the cop's actions), who would have been lauded as heroes. Then, some Liberal Democrat would propose a bill before the State or National Legislature attempting to ban tractors and bulldozers as assault weapons. Lastly, the Obama administration would issue a letter of apology to Hamas for the misunderstanding and offer another $900 Billion for the Palestinians.
[EDIT: /Sarcasm]
Did I miss anything?
|||
Pax,
Newbius
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)