“Aren’t we at the point where the closer we get to chaos, the more concern that there should be about coming to the table and compromising with Democrats?” Wasserman Schultz asked. “This is not leadership. This is almost like dictatorship. I know they want to force the outcome that … their extremists would like to impose. But they are getting ready to spark panic and chaos, and they seem to be OK with that. And it’s just really disappointing, and potentially devastating."
All that power and not a brain cell to be found...
Listen here, you (expletive-deleted) piece of maggot-infested dog squeeze: Your side of the aisle hasn't done ANYTHING about the budget (except blow it up beyond any level considered sane) for more than 2 years. Unlike the last Republican you dealt with, this guy might actually have some calcium in his spine. You HAVE to consider his proposals because YOUR side will not present a proposal of their own.
Sitting in the corner and crying into your Wooby that the Republicans aren't giving you "bi-partisan" cover for your socialist schemes isn't working. Instead of vilifying the House leadership because they did their job, maybe you can shame ObeyMe or Reid into doing theirs? Your accusations of Dictatorship are ringing hollow. Quit projecting your actions onto others and start acting like an adult.
This Democratic temper-tantrum is getting old. If you Democrats want to be able to control the agenda, then WIN THE GORRAM ELECTION! Otherwise, COMPROMISE. YOUR SIDE has to bend on this, and you know it. MSNBC and DNCNN might give you cover, but the American people will no longer do so. Oh, and Debbie? The reason why your side is in the minority right now in the house is BECAUSE you controlled the agenda for 4 years and destroyed the economy in the process.
Sigh...somebody change her diaper. She is beginning to smell.
Newbius
3 comments:
You are soft.
Your post was a candlelight dinner and a hug to D W-S...
... compared to what I usually say about her.
Amazingly, if you changed just one word in her statement, it would actually be true. The one word? "Republicans" If you changed it to "Democrats" it would actually reflect the real situation.
She's acting like a petulant child. Then again, she's a Liberal so that's to be expected.
Post a Comment