Ah, but where does one's right to lawfully carry a firearm intrude on another person's right to peacefully assemble or even the right to free speech?
Certainly there's an effect fostered by the presence of the gun, even if no threat of violence is implied. Does this effect abridge free speech? Does it coerce one from peaceful assembly
As the article states, it's a "fuzzy, grey area" that our judiciary should decide.
1 comment:
Ah, but where does one's right to lawfully carry a firearm intrude on another person's right to peacefully assemble or even the right to free speech?
Certainly there's an effect fostered by the presence of the gun, even if no threat of violence is implied. Does this effect abridge free speech? Does it coerce one from peaceful assembly
As the article states, it's a "fuzzy, grey area" that our judiciary should decide.
Post a Comment