tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6148719993180036093.post5481402549365574372..comments2023-04-13T05:50:18.620-04:00Comments on The Newbius Papers: And the winning email is...Newbiushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09501998014769060130noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6148719993180036093.post-69094344168919872732010-02-06T22:22:59.847-05:002010-02-06T22:22:59.847-05:00Right, except for our guys (yeah, yeah and gals) s...Right, except for our guys (yeah, yeah and gals) still in Afgannistan.<br /><br />As for NAFTA, please, go ahead. We were not too thrilled with our Fed giving away our manufacturing to US companies straddled with less regulation and taxation, but it really stung when Mexico was invited to what turned into a manage-a-trois. But then they lost it all to China. Guess what goes around sometimes does come around.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6148719993180036093.post-12029855876760381012010-01-28T19:42:19.949-05:002010-01-28T19:42:19.949-05:00I always wondered what kind of backward logic allo...I always wondered what kind of backward logic allowed us to pour money of unfathomable numbers and almost phantom origins into other countries, without ourselves becoming self-sufficient and able to take care of ourselves first. <br /><br />I'm wondering why we didn't go back to isolationism after WWII. We did what we meant to do during the war (getting payback for the attack on Pearl Harbor), why did we just abondon that principle?Mike W.https://www.blogger.com/profile/00914040123062286638noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6148719993180036093.post-88698929670919060122010-01-28T18:14:55.639-05:002010-01-28T18:14:55.639-05:00That would about do it, I think.
JimThat would about do it, I think.<br /><br />JimAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6148719993180036093.post-70601439870431972312010-01-27T19:25:01.392-05:002010-01-27T19:25:01.392-05:00Jim,
How about we compromise and leave Quebec a...Jim, <br /><br />How about we compromise and leave Quebec and British Columbia (or even just Vancouver) on List 2 and put the rest of Canada on List 1? Would that be better?<br /><br />:)<br /><br />NewbiusNewbiushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/09501998014769060130noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-6148719993180036093.post-49714946362726755762010-01-27T19:01:08.241-05:002010-01-27T19:01:08.241-05:00Good except for Canada being on list #2.
JimGood except for Canada being on list #2.<br /><br />JimAnonymousnoreply@blogger.com